Wednesday, 28 August 2024
Adjournment
Sexual offences
-
Commencement
-
Bills
-
Youth Justice Bill 2024
-
Council’s amendments
-
-
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
-
Committees
-
Legal and Social Issues Committee
-
Membership
-
-
-
Motions
-
Middle East conflict
-
-
Members statements
-
360biolabs
-
Planning policy
-
Tim Decker
-
Horseracing
-
V/Line services
-
Health services
-
Little River freight terminal
-
Preston Reservoir Bowls Club
-
Climate change
-
Greenwood, Mulgrave
-
Ukraine Independence Day
-
Apollo Bay Mechanics Institute Hall
-
Powerful Owl Park
-
Suburban Rail Loop
-
-
Production of documents
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Committees
-
Environment and Planning Committee
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Greyhound racing
-
Medically supervised injecting facilities
-
Ministers statements: emergency services
-
University tuition
-
International students
-
Ministers statements: water policy
-
Water policy
-
Electricity infrastructure
-
Ministers statements: Aboriginal Children’s Forum
-
Electricity infrastructure
-
Ministers statements: multicultural communities
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
-
Business of the house
-
Orders of the day
-
-
Motions
-
Bills
-
Government Construction Projects Integrity Bill 2024
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Motions
-
Electricity infrastructure
-
-
Statements on tabled papers and petitions
-
Mine Land Rehabilitation Authority
-
Report 2022–23
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2024–25
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2024–25
-
-
Corella control
-
Petition
-
-
-
Petitions
-
Wonthaggi planning
-
-
Adjournment
-
Housing affordability
-
Sexual offences
-
Broadmeadows Road–Johnstone Street, Westmeadows
-
LGBTIQA+ community
-
Anam Cara House, Geelong
-
Land Forces International Land Defence Exposition
-
Wild dog control
-
Animal welfare
-
Child protection
-
Myki ticketing system
-
Energy policy
-
Commonwealth Games
-
Corrections system
-
Schools funding
-
Victorian public service enterprise bargaining agreement
-
Responses
-
Sexual offences
Rachel PAYNE (South-Eastern Metropolitan) (17:59): (1087) My adjournment matter is for the Attorney-General.
The Victorian Government should provide funding for people who wish to bring civil proceedings against a non-institutional defendant (or defendants) for sexual assault where:
a. their case raises important systemic or legal issues, or
b. they face multiple barriers to justice and their case has reasonable prospects of success.
This was recommendation 41 of the Victorian Law Reform Commission’s 2021 report Improving the Justice System Response to Sexual Offences. Civil litigation can provide an alternative to criminal justice where someone does not want to report sexual violence to police, where the police or the Director of Public Prosecutions decides not to prosecute or where a criminal trial occurs but the accused is found not guilty. We know that these experiences are common, and when it comes to reporting sexual assaults, survivors are understandably reluctant. They see it in the news and they hear it from their friends: survivors go through hell and back even to get into court, and when they do, they are often judged, ridiculed and left with nothing. With a lower standard of proof, civil litigation means a survivor is more likely to be successful. It can also help a survivor to receive damages, an acknowledgement of the violence and its impacts and a sense of closure. Beyond this it allows us to send a message that sexual violence has serious consequences and that survivors will get the justice they deserve.
Notwithstanding these benefits, civil litigation for sexual assault does have drawbacks. It is not funded by Victoria Legal Aid and can be costly, lengthy and retraumatising. Aboriginal people, people with disabilities and LGBTIQA+ communities are more likely to experience sexual violence and are also more likely to experience barriers to accessing justice. This is why the Victorian Law Reform Commission’s recommendation is so essential, but to date this government has failed to respond to this recommendation. So I ask: will the Attorney-General agree to recommendation 41 of the Victorian Law Reform Commission’s report and ensure access to justice for survivors of sexual assault?