Tuesday, 28 November 2023
Members statements
Public service workforce
-
Commencement
-
Bills
- Early Childhood Legislation Amendment (Premises Approval in Principle) Bill 2023
- Transport Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
-
Environment Legislation Amendment (Circular Economy and Other Matters) Bill 2023
-
Royal assent
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Immigration detention
-
Ministers statements: Changing Places
-
State Emergency Service funding
-
Medicinal cannabis
-
Ministers statements: community legal centres
-
Country Fire Authority resources
-
Justice portfolio consultancy expenditure
-
Ministers statements: Tiny Towns Fund
-
Game Management Authority board
-
Event accessibility
-
Ministers statements: prison visitor schemes
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Petitions
-
Mount Eliza Secondary College
-
Wild horse control
-
-
Papers
-
Consumer Policy Research Centre
-
Report 2022–23
-
-
-
Committees
-
Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee
-
Alert Digest No. 15
-
-
Legal and Social Issues Committee
-
Inquiry into the Rental and Housing Affordability Crisis in Victoria
-
-
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee
-
Gambling and Liquor Regulation in Victoria: A Follow up of Three Auditor-General Reports
-
-
-
Business of the house
-
Invitation from Legislative Assembly
-
Standing and sessional orders
-
-
Papers
-
Petitions
-
Nepean Highway, Frankston, planning
-
-
Business of the house
- Notices
-
General business
-
Committees
-
Parliamentary committees
-
Membership
-
-
-
Members statements
-
Gender equality
-
Water policy
-
Northern Victoria Region AFL draft picks
-
Furphy family
-
Public service workforce
-
16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence
-
Health system
-
School Strike 4 Climate
-
Melbourne Holocaust Museum
-
Renewable energy
-
Student political engagement
-
William Taylor
-
Animal welfare
-
Natasha Taleski
-
Felicitations
-
Beaufort Agricultural Society annual show
-
Ballarat citizenship ceremony
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Bills
-
Corrections Amendment (Parole Reform) Bill 2023
-
Crimes Amendment (Non-fatal Strangulation) Bill 2023
-
-
Adjournment
-
Age of criminal responsibility
-
Renewable energy
-
Northern Victoria Region health services
-
Nursing students
-
Herne Swamp
-
Shepparton bypass
-
Wombat mange
-
Energy policy
-
Cost of living
-
Bushfire preparedness
-
Oil and gas exploration
-
Newport level crossing removals
-
Berwick Church of Christ
-
Wild dog control
-
Housing
-
Responses
-
Public service workforce
Adem SOMYUREK (Northern Metropolitan) (13:47): The decentralisation of public service jobs into suburban Melbourne and the regions gathered pace with the Bracks–Brumby governments in the 2000s. I recall attending the opening of the State Trustees office in Dandenong in the mid-2000s. Victoria’s planning blueprint, released in 2014 under the Liberal government, proposed to expand the decentralisation by earmarking various suburban centres to become decentralised cities outside the CBD, including Epping and Broadmeadows in my current electorate.
Earlier this month, a prominent planning firm released a new economic analysis of the benefits to Melbourne’s transport networks and local suburbs if all new jobs in the Victorian public service were located in five suburban centres. The analysis forecast over $27 billion in benefits over 30 years, including $22.4 billion in productivity improvements, $3.94 billion in transport and $1.01 billion in amenity improvements. The figures reveal that the locating of public sector jobs in the suburbs will create self-reliance and vibrant suburban centres, which will in turn lead to productivity improvements. If the government is serious about building 80,000 new homes within the next 10 years, they must take note of this study and incorporate the potential solutions contained in this study as one innovative tool in addressing the housing crisis.